The technological future is more predictable than you think.

Almost no one measures which one that is.

A measurement, not a prediction in the usual AI sense
Validated against 28 empirically measured domains of technology
Same math used to call EV batteries, SSDs, and digital payments years before the market
Inspired by MIT research.
Trusted by global innovators.
WHY THIS METHODOLOGY EXISTS

The puzzle is growing faster than you can lay down the pieces.

In the early 1900s, there were a few hundred fields of technology. Today there are over 265,000. By the early 2030s, projections put it past 300,000.

The volume of technology a senior R&D leader is expected to track has scaled exponentially. The number of hours in their week has not. The result is a structural mismatch between what they are supposed to see and what they actually can.

Emerging technology fields over time
01
265k+
Areas of emerging technology
Up from a few hundred in 1900. Projected past 300,000 by the early 2030s.
02
10–20%
Of the week spent on the future
Most of an R&D leader's day is current operations and internal politics. The strategic work happens in whatever is left.
03
9 figures
Per bet, on average
Wrong technology calls don't waste budget. They obsolete platforms, miss markets, and define careers.
Why current approaches break down

For 25 years, MIT measured how fast technologies actually improve.

There are two dominant ways organizations try to see what's coming next. Both have a structural ceiling.

Approach 01

Experts

Experts are valuable. You should keep using them. But no expert can read every relevant patent, paper, and filing across the global landscape. And most experts are deepest in the field they already know best. That depth is exactly what creates blind spots when disruption arrives from an adjacent industry.

  • Strong at filtering signal and translating it into action.
  • Cannot read the volume of information that now exists.
  • Biased toward their own domain. Unlikely to flag threats to their expertise.
Approache 02

Trend and monitoring tools

These count things. Investment dollars, papers, patents, news mentions. That is a measure of popularity, not progress. And history is full of very popular, very dumb ideas. Counting what people are paying attention to tells you nothing about which technology is actually getting better fastest.

  • Faster than searching manually.
  • Counts activity. Investment, papers, patents. None of which measure progress.
  • Shows you where the herd is going. The herd is often wrong.

To predict disruption, you have to measure something different. You have to measure improvement itself.

WHY THIS METHODOLOGY EXISTS

30 years of MIT research, 28 domains, one consistent finding.

01
MIT realized they had lots of theories but no data
02
Started measuring empirically how fast technologies had gotten better
03
Did this for all 28 technology domains
3d Printing
Miling
Photo-lit
Super-Cond
Aircraft
Comb-Engine
Elec-Motor
Fuel-Cells
Incanlight
Elec-Comp
Int-Circ
COAX
Wireless
Opt storage
LED-light
Solar
Wind
Elec-transm
Batteries
Capacitors
Flywheel-ES
Camera-s
CT scan
Genome SQ
MRI
Opt-telecom
Magnetic stor
Semic stor
30 years of MIT research, 28 domains, one consistent finding.

30 years of MIT research, 28 domains, one consistent finding.

There are two dominant ways organizations try to see what's coming next. Both have a structural ceiling.

01
Scout all emerging technologies

Eliminate strategic blind spots.

02
Map the tech terrain

Instantly map the IP landscape for all emerging technologies.

03
Spot the winners

Our technology improvement rate will show where to bet years before it's obvious.

04
Deep-dive & act

Get direct answers to your most complex R&D questions.

The evidence

MIT Section

MIT measured how fast technologies actually improve for Hard Drives.

Hard Drive Cost Per Gigabyte (USD)
Avg. improvement rate 32% per year

MIT found that every technology improves exponentially at a measurable rate, like compound interest.
Every technology improves at its own rate. A technology improvement rate (TIR) represents how quickly a technology improves from a cost and performance perspective.

Sounds too good to be true? Hear it from our customers:

The combination of smart algorithms with the individual commitment of the team from GetFocus provides essential insights for making informed strategic R&D investments and helps us innovate faster."

Dr. Joseph R. Wuensch
Svp r&d - performance materials

In a week with GetFocus, we achieved more than what we previously could in 9 months.

Christopher Perthuisot
chief r&d officer, moet hennessy

GetFocus accelerates our learning curve, helping us pinpoint where to direct our efforts more effectively. It's an invaluable tool for validating the insights of our in-house experts, ensuring that we can objectively assess new technologies"

Matteo Munari
head of technology, alfa laval

What's coming next in your industry - It's already here

Check out our insight reports.

Ready to see it in action?

Discover how GetFocus can reliably predict the technological future.

Talk to us